Lost in Space

By: Peggy Nelson
November 22, 2010


[The Andes, 10/28/01 ASTER]

LandSat’s views of Earth have been made increasingly available over the internet in low-resolution image galleries, suitable for wallpaper, screensavers, and screening portions of the planet on a monitor near you. Or a wall . . .


[David Bowie in The Man Who Fell to Earth, dir. Nicolas Roeg, 1976]

Nominally these are of the land (and sea), although they do of course record the in-between. I find the portraits of the air especially lovely, ephemeral vortices and whirlpools whose curves belie their strength.


[Karman Vortices, Alexander Selkirk Island (Pacific Ocean), 9/15/1999]


[Whirlpool in the Air, Greenland, 5/14/2001]

But I wonder too, what if LandSat (or something like it) could be programmed to project? What if an orbiting satellite could be fitted with a region-sized projector that could, without losing resolution and brightness, beam the transmitted images back on top of the places they are from, like a digital version of Borges’ Map? Would this be an aid to knowledge, overlaying an aerial perspective directly onto more finely-grained experience? Would it be a visual phenomenon on a grand scale, a double-rainbow of detail and wonder?


[The Weather Project, Olafur Eliasson, exhibited at the Tate Modern, 2003-04]

Perhaps one might feel closer to the environment by walking through it as well as upon it. And the projection might be made “clickable,” an immersive mashup, a projected kinectable journey. Or — would it be instead an alienation of light; inevitably coopted by advertising, something to be subverted and dismantled, surviving only in fragments of lost potential and packaging?


[The Sony Center colonizes the sky, Potsdamer Platz, Berlin]

In any case it wouldn’t be exact. Even with the most powerful processors, projections beamed back upon the place beneath lag behind their captive data; all records are records of the past. The mirrors on our ceiling are never maps of where we’re going, or even where we are; only where we’ve been.

But even if such a feat were feasible, it would only be viewable at night, where it would interfere with the projection we already have. On a larger and more ancient scale, the stars project a history of deep time across the upturned faces of land, sea and eye.

We may be lost in space, but we do have the Map.


[Large Magellanic Cloud, Hubble Space Telescope]


[Sledgehammer, Peter Gabriel in starsuit, 1986]

Categories

Haw-Haw, Spectacles

What do you think?

  1. “What if an orbiting satellite could be fitted with a region-sized projector that could, without losing resolution and brightness, beam the transmitted images back on top of the places they are from, like a digital version of Borges’ Map? Would this be an aid to knowledge, overlaying an aerial perspective directly onto more finely-grained experience? Would it be a visual phenomenon on a grand scale, a double-rainbow of detail and wonder?”

    Um, yes! I once had a low-res/tech idea that wasn’t nearly as cool: figure out where the paved-over streams are in my neighborhood and paint the pavement and sidewalks blue to mark their courses. Your idea is much cooler.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.